The inclusion of all necessary information on the extent of authorized use is extremely important in SaaS agreements, as should be the case: before using a model, companies should consider whether the use of a lawyer is commercially justified. In a sense, a model is not a substitute for a lawyer. Lawyers are also working on precedents. By choosing to use a model, you are acting as a lawyer. This software AS A SERVICE LICENSE AGREEMENT (this “contract”) exists between Netpeak LTD, a limited liability company that has its main place of activity Unit 2000, 2nd Floor, 6 Market Place, Fitzrovia, London, United Kingdom, W1W 8AF, below “Company,” “We” (or otherwise, as the context requires) and any individual or legal person who is subscribed or user of the “software” (see below) , with the exception of those that should enter into another agreement that applies to most SaaS apps, you must design your contract so that the license applies to services, not software. Many as-a-service software contracts (SaaS) grant a “license” for the use of the vendor`s software. It`s a mistake. Licenses are available for on-premise software. SaaS is a service, as the name suggests, and it does not need a license. And if you`re the supplier, a license can hurt you. Software licensing agreements have maintenance clauses, the vendor is committed to solving all software-related problems and ensuring that it is always updated and updated so that the customer is no longer lagging behind other users. This does not apply to a SaaS agreement because the customer cannot keep his own copy. In most cases, when the customer upgrades or updates on their own computers, the customer should benefit automatically (depending on the terms of the agreement).